Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether paragraph 4 of Schedule III to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Stock Brokers and Sub-Brokers) Regulations, 1992 entitled stock brokers who had converted into corporate entities before 01.04.1997 to fee continuity benefit.
Analysis: Paragraph 4, though inserted by amendment with effect from 21.01.1998, did not expressly or by necessary implication restrict the fee continuity benefit to conversions made on or after any particular date. In a fiscal provision conferring a benefit, no words could be read in or deleted, and any doubt had to go in favour of the stock brokers. The explanation introduced later reinforced this position by deeming the converted corporate entity to be a continuation of the old entity and by prohibiting collection of fee again for the period already covered by the earlier entity. The provision created no new liability or obligation and operated as an embargo on future collection of fee where the conditions for continuity were satisfied.
Conclusion: The benefit of fee continuity was available even to corporate entities formed by conversion before 01.04.1997, and the challenge by SEBI failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A beneficial fiscal provision conferring fee continuity must be construed on its plain language, without adding restrictive words, and in the absence of an express cutoff date it extends to all entities satisfying the statutory conditions.