Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit on steel items used for fabrication and installation of components and accessories of capital goods in the sugar factory.
Analysis: The items in question were used for fabrication of machinery and allied components such as cane carrier, juice clarifier, evaporator, pan station, molasses tanks and boiler-related structures, which formed part of the capital goods used in manufacture of sugar and molasses. The cases relied on by the Revenue were distinguished on facts, as they concerned supporting structures embedded to earth and immovable assets. The circulars clarifying that structural components used essentially as part of boiler systems are to be treated as parts of the boiler also supported the appellant's claim. Accordingly, the items were treated as inputs used for fabrication of capital goods and not as mere civil or immovable structures.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to avail Cenvat credit on the items in question and was not required to reverse the credit.