1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal Grants Stay Extension, Emphasizes Speaking Order & Appellant Readiness</h1> The Tribunal granted an extension of stay until the appeal's disposal due to the backlog of appeals and challenges in scheduling hearings, emphasizing the ... Extension of period of stay – appeal was not taken up for hearing after passing of Stay Order and there is no negligence on his part for hearing of the appeal – Held That:- Appeal was not taken for hearing as there is huge pendency of the appeals - Extension of stay granted till the disposal of the appeal – Decided in favour of the Appellant. Issues:Extension of period of stay in a miscellaneous application.Analysis:The applicant filed a miscellaneous application seeking an extension of the period of stay granted in a previous order. The Tribunal referred to a previous judgment by the Larger Bench in the case of M/s Haldiram India Pvt. Limited & others Vs Commissioner, Central Excise & Service Tax. The Tribunal held that even if the initial period of stay has expired, an extension could be granted if the appeal could not be disposed of due to reasons not attributable to the appellant and if the appellant was ready and willing for the disposal of the appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a speaking order disclosing the satisfaction of the Tribunal regarding the absence of any delay or protractive strategies by the appellant. The Tribunal directed the Registry to maintain a separate register to prioritize appeals where stay has been granted. The Tribunal answered the reference by allowing for extensions of stay beyond the initial period under specific conditions.The applicant's advocate argued that the appeal was not taken up for hearing after the stay order was passed, citing no negligence or inaction on the part of the applicant. On the other hand, the Revenue's authorized representative contended that the appellant had not taken necessary steps for the appeal's disposal. The Tribunal, after hearing both sides and examining the records, acknowledged the huge pendency of appeals, making it challenging to schedule the appeal for a hearing at that time. Consequently, the Tribunal granted an extension of stay until the appeal's disposal, considering the circumstances and the backlog of appeals. The miscellaneous application filed by the applicant was disposed of accordingly.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
