Prospective Cenvat credit restriction bars later-accrued credit from paying earlier fortnight duty; penalty relief noted.

A prospective amendment to Rule 57AB(1)(b) restricted Cenvat credit utilisation to the credit available on the last day of the relevant fortnight for duty payment for that fortnight. Credit accruing in the subsequent period could not be used to discharge duty for an earlier fortnight, so the duty liability had to be paid in cash. The article also notes that the penalty imposed under Rule 173C(1) was not sustained, as the immediate post-amendment factual setting justified relief from penal consequences even though the duty demand remained upheld.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether, after the amendment introduced by Notification No. 48/2000-C.E. (N.T.), Cenvat credit accrued during the subsequent period could be used for payment of duty for the earlier fortnight. (ii) Whether the penalty imposed under Rule 173C(1) was sustainable.

Issue (i): Whether, after the amendment introduced by Notification No. 48/2000-C.E. (N.T.), Cenvat credit accrued during the subsequent period could be used for payment of duty for the earlier fortnight.

Analysis: Rule 57AB(1)(b), as amended with effect from 18.08.2000, restricted utilisation of Cenvat credit to the credit available on the last day of the relevant fortnight for payment of duty for that fortnight. The amendment was treated as prospective, and the appellant could not use credit that arose during 01.09.2000 to 05.09.2000 for duty relating to the fortnight ending 31.08.2000. The cited decisions did not assist because they concerned payments for periods prior to the amendment.

Conclusion: The restriction applied and the duty liability had to be discharged in cash. This issue was decided against the appellant.

Issue (ii): Whether the penalty imposed under Rule 173C(1) was sustainable.

Analysis: The default occurred immediately after the amendment, and the circumstances were treated as warranting relief from penalty even though the duty demand was upheld. The factual setting was considered relevant to the penal consequence.

Conclusion: The penalty was set aside and this issue was decided in favour of the appellant.

Final Conclusion: The appeal failed on the principal duty-demand issue, but the penal consequence was deleted, resulting in partial relief only.

Ratio Decidendi: A statutory restriction on utilisation of Cenvat credit, introduced prospectively by amendment, governs duty payment for the relevant fortnight, and credit accrued for a later period cannot be used to discharge an earlier fortnight's duty obligation.

---