Court upholds bad debt write-off, deems interest on ICDs business activity under Income Tax Act

The High Court dismissed the appeal regarding disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, noting a settled matter from a previous year. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to allow the written-off amount as bad debt under section 36 (1) (vii) r.w.s.36 (2), emphasizing that interest earned on InterCorporate Deposits (ICDs) was part of business activity. The Court rejected the revenue's contentions, stating the interest not received could be written off under section 36 (1) (vii) and allowed the principal amount and interest as business loss. The appeal was dismissed without costs.

---

---

Issues:
1. Disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961
2. Allowance of written-off amount as bad debt under section 36 (1) (vii) r.w.s.36 (2)

Issue 1: Disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961
The High Court addressed the issue of disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act in the context of an appeal challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal) for the assessment year 2002-03. The revenue questioned the Tribunal's decision to restore the issue of disallowance under section 14A for fresh consideration. However, the Court noted that a previous order had settled the matter against the revenue in favor of the respondent-assessee for the assessment year 2001-02. Consequently, the Court did not entertain this question as it did not give rise to any substantial question of law.

Issue 2: Allowance of written-off amount as bad debt under section 36 (1) (vii) r.w.s.36 (2)
Regarding the allowance of a written-off amount as a bad debt under section 36 (1) (vii) r.w.s.36 (2) of the Act, the respondent-assessee had debited an amount to the Profit and Loss A/c for InterCorporate Deposits (ICDs) that were written off during the assessment year. The Assessing Officer initially disallowed the claim for deduction on account of the write-off as ICDs. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld this decision. However, the Tribunal, in its order, considered the interest received on ICDs as business income and accepted it for taxation from previous years. The Tribunal held that the interest received on ICDs being taxed as business income necessitated the allowance of the principal amount as business loss and the interest amount as bad debt under section 36 (1) (vii) read with section 36 (2) of the Act.

The Court found that the revenue's contention that the adjustment of amounts received from debtors on ICDs should have been done differently was not valid. It noted that the interest not received could be written off under section 36 (1) (vii) of the Act. Additionally, the Court emphasized that the interest earned on ICDs was part of the business activity, allowing for the deduction of the principal amount and interest as business loss. Referring to previous judgments, the Court concluded that the principal amount would also be allowed as a deduction under section 36 (2) (i) of the Act.

Moreover, the Court cited a previous case where similar contentions were raised by the revenue, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The Court held that the issue did not give rise to any substantial question of law and, therefore, was not entertained. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal, stating that no costs were to be awarded.

---