Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2015 (10) TMI 2017 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal adjusts total income based on issues, assessee's appeals partly allowed, revenue's appeals dismissed. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to compute the total income for all years based on its decisions on various issues. If the computed income is ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal adjusts total income based on issues, assessee's appeals partly allowed, revenue's appeals dismissed.

                          The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to compute the total income for all years based on its decisions on various issues. If the computed income is less than the returned or assessed income, the total income should be at the returned or assessed level. The assessee's appeals were partly allowed, and the revenue's appeals were dismissed.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Rejection of books of account.
                          2. Estimation of profit.
                          3. Assessment of income surrendered by the assessee separately.
                          4. Rejection of claim for deduction of depreciation.
                          5. Claim for higher rate of depreciation on vehicles.
                          6. Allowing deduction of remuneration and interest payable to partners.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Rejection of Books of Account:
                          The Assessing Officer (AO) rejected the books of account maintained by the assessee under section 145(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to various discrepancies, including defective vouchers, unaccounted receipts, and unverifiable payments. The CIT(A) upheld the rejection, noting that the books were not reliable enough to give a true and correct picture of the business. The Tribunal agreed, stating that the deficiencies and discrepancies in the books of account were significant and that the partner's admission of following the same practices in earlier years justified the rejection.

                          2. Estimation of Profit:
                          The AO estimated the net profit from the business operations at varying percentages for different assessment years. The CIT(A) scaled down these percentages, taking into account the nature of the assessee's business and judicial precedents. The Tribunal further modified these percentages, considering the net profit rate declared by the assessee in earlier years and the fact that a significant portion of the gross receipts were reimbursements with a lower profit margin. The Tribunal adopted net profit rates of 2.5%, 3.5%, 4%, and 7% for the assessment years 2004-05 to 2007-08, respectively.

                          3. Assessment of Income Surrendered by the Assessee Separately:
                          The CIT(A) directed the AO to assess the additional income surrendered by the assessee separately from the estimated net profit. The Tribunal disagreed, stating that both the additional income and the estimated profit aimed to arrive at the correct amount of profits. Hence, the Tribunal held that the additional income should be telescoped against the net profit estimated, preventing double assessment of the same income.

                          4. Rejection of Claim for Deduction of Depreciation:
                          Both the AO and CIT(A) rejected the assessee's claim for depreciation. The Tribunal, however, found merit in the assessee's contention that depreciation is a statutory deduction and should be allowed separately. The Tribunal directed the AO to allow the admissible depreciation against the estimated income.

                          5. Claim for Higher Rate of Depreciation on Vehicles:
                          The assessee claimed a higher rate of depreciation on vehicles used for transport purposes. The Tribunal remanded this issue to the AO for factual verification and appropriate decision in accordance with the law.

                          6. Allowing Deduction of Remuneration and Interest Payable to Partners:
                          The CIT(A) allowed the deduction for remuneration and interest payable to partners, following judicial precedents that considered such deductions allowable against estimated income. The Tribunal upheld this decision, noting that the AO had assessed the remuneration and interest in the hands of the partners, even though it was not allowed as a deduction in the hands of the assessee firm.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal directed the AO to compute the total income for all the years under consideration based on the Tribunal's decisions on various issues. If the computed income for any year is less than the returned or already assessed income, the total income should be determined at the level of the returned or already assessed income. The appeals filed by the assessee were partly allowed, and the appeals of the revenue were dismissed.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found