Tribunal allows appeal, condones delay, exempts TDS with Form 15-I, dismisses disallowances.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, condoning the delay in filing the appeal and admitting it for hearing. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) regarding Section 194C was deleted as the assessee had submitted Form No. 15-I, exempting TDS deduction. The appeal ground on disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for Section 194A was dismissed. Disallowance of office expenses and confirmation of interest under Section 234B were also dismissed due to lack of arguments.

---

---

Issues:
1. Condonation of delay in filing the appeal.
2. Disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) with regard to Section 194C.
3. Disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) with regard to Section 194A.
4. Disallowance partly out of office expenses.
5. Confirmation of interest charged under section 234B of the IT Act.

Issue 1: Condonation of Delay in Filing the Appeal:
The appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-VI, Surat, which was one day beyond the prescribed limitation. The assessee filed a condonation petition, stating valid reasons for the delay. The Tribunal, after hearing both parties and finding the reasons satisfactory, condoned the delay and admitted the appeal for hearing.

Issue 2: Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) with regard to Section 194C:
The primary contention revolved around disallowance of Rs. 28,70,136 under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS under Section 194C. The assessee argued that as per the second proviso to sub-section (3) of section 194C, no TDS was required if Form No. 15-I was obtained from the deductee. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had indeed filed the declaration in prescribed form before the income-tax authorities, absolving the liability to deduct TDS. The Tribunal emphasized that receipt of the declaration was sufficient, and failure to furnish it within the due date did not warrant disallowance under section 40(a)(ia). Citing a Gujarat High Court decision, the Tribunal deleted the disallowance and allowed this ground of appeal.

Issue 3: Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) with regard to Section 194A:
The appeal included a contention regarding disallowance of Rs. 79,680 under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS under Section 194A. However, during the hearing, the assessee's representative did not press this ground of appeal, leading to its dismissal.

Issue 4: Disallowance Partly Out of Office Expenses:
Another issue concerned the disallowance of Rs. 6,400 out of office expenses by the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) - IV. The Tribunal noted that no arguments were presented during the hearing on this matter, resulting in the dismissal of this ground of appeal.

Issue 5: Confirmation of Interest Charged under Section 234B of the IT Act:
The appeal also raised concerns about the confirmation of interest charged under section 234B of the IT Act. However, as no arguments were made during the hearing on this issue, it was dismissed for want of prosecution.

In conclusion, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee, addressing various grounds and issues raised during the proceedings.

---

---