Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order passed under section 11 of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 was barred by limitation.
Analysis: The appeal turned on the effect of the amendment to section 11 of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948, which prescribed a three-year time limit for completion of assessment. The relevant assessment year was 1997-98, and the last date for filing the final return fell after the amendment came into force. The Court followed the earlier ruling that the substituted provision conferred a substantive right on the assessee to have the assessment completed within the prescribed period and applied to pending assessment proceedings for that year. Since the assessment order was passed after expiry of the three-year period, it was without jurisdiction and time-barred.
Conclusion: The assessment order was barred by limitation and the appeal was without merit.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a substituted assessment provision prescribes a time limit for completion of assessment and the last date for return filing falls after the amendment, the limitation applies to the pending assessment proceedings and an order passed after expiry of that period is barred by limitation.