Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit could be denied merely because the additional customs duty was discharged through DEPB debit under the prevailing Exim Policy and exemption notifications, in the absence of a specific restriction in the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002.
Analysis: The clearance of imported inputs under the DEPB-based exemption scheme was treated as a duty-neutral mechanism tied to exports, and the court read the scheme, the exemption notification, the circular, and the Cenvat Credit Rules together. It held that the relevant legal position changed from 1.4.2000 onwards, because the policy then contained an express prohibition that where additional customs duty was adjusted from DEPB, no Cenvat benefit would be admissible. The court further noted that the import document for the year 2003 did not show cash payment of duty and that the earlier decision relied on by the assessee applied only to the period before the restrictive wording was introduced.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit was not admissible on the facts, and the question of law was answered against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the governing import/export policy expressly bars Cenvat benefit for additional customs duty adjusted through DEPB, credit cannot be claimed on such duty.