1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal rules in favor of distributors on service tax liability for telephone services, citing legal precedent.</h1> The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeals regarding service tax liability on telephone services, citing precedent from G.R. Movers and the High Court of ... Commission agent / distributor of BSNL sim cards - Receipt of commission - business of marketing and selling of Pre-paid and Post-paid mobile connections, Pre-paid Recharge vouchers - Held that:- Issue involved in this case is now squarely settled by the judgment of the Tribunal in the case of G.R. Movers [2013 (6) TMI 339 - CESTAT NEW DELHI], wherein identical issue was considered. Aggrieved by such an order of the Tribunal, Revenue preferred an appeal before the Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad and their Lordships dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue which is reported at [2013 (11) TMI 1558 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] - Demand of service tax set aside - Decided against Revenue. Issues Involved:Service tax liability under the category of telephone services.Analysis:The appeals revolve around the service tax liability concerning telephone services. The respondent, engaged in marketing and selling mobile connections and recharge vouchers, did not recover service tax on commission from M/s. BSNL. The adjudicating authority upheld the demand, but the first appellate authority set aside the Orders-in-Original, prompting the Revenue to appeal. The Tribunal referred to the settled issue in the case of G.R. Movers, where it was established that once service tax liability on the full value of the SIM card is discharged by BSNL, there should be no further demand on the distributor. This principle was reinforced by the Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad in subsequent appeals. Consequently, the Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue's appeals, affirming the correctness and legality of the impugned orders. As a result, the appeals were rejected.This judgment clarifies the service tax liability in the context of telephone services, emphasizing the distributor's obligation once BSNL has discharged the service tax on the full value of the SIM card. The decision is based on precedents set by the Tribunal and upheld by the Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad, establishing a clear legal position on the issue. The Tribunal's ruling ensures consistency and adherence to established legal principles, providing clarity for future cases involving similar service tax liabilities in the telephone services sector.