Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether agricultural land situated within eight kilometres of municipal limits but covered by a later notification under section 2(14)(iii)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be treated as a capital asset so as to attract capital gains tax on a sale completed before the notification.
Analysis: The definition of "capital asset" in section 2(14)(iii)(b) applied only where the Central Government had, by notification in the Official Gazette, specified the relevant area having regard to the extent and scope for urbanisation and other relevant considerations. On the material facts, the sale transaction was completed before the notification came into existence. In the absence of the notification on the date of completion of the transfer, the land could not be brought within the statutory definition merely because it was within eight kilometres of the municipal limits.
Conclusion: The land did not constitute a capital asset on the relevant date, and the surplus from its sale was not chargeable to capital gains tax. The answer is in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: For agricultural land to fall within section 2(14)(iii)(b), the statutory notification specifying the area must exist on the date the transfer is completed; a later notification cannot retrospectively convert the land into a capital asset.