Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 was sustainable where service tax and interest were paid before issuance of the show cause notice and the delay in payment was claimed to be bona fide.
Analysis: The liability related only to delayed remittance of service tax for a limited period, and the interest was paid during audit before the show cause notice. The delay was found to be attributable to the time taken to collect and compile data from multiple turnkey project sites. In such circumstances, the facts were treated as genuine and comparable to cases where the benefit of Section 73(3) has been applied to avoid penalty, particularly where there was no active suppression or deliberate default. The Tribunal also accepted that the circumstances justified invocation of the statutory relaxation from penalty.
Conclusion: Penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 was not sustainable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.