1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court rules in favor of assessee, excludes certain incomes. Parties to bear own costs. Decision to be communicated.</h1> The High Court of Rajasthan ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that certain incomes were not includible in the income of Shri Birdhi Chand. The ... Appeal To AAC, Firm The High Court of Rajasthan answered questions 1 and 2 in favor of the assessee, stating that the incomes of Curious House, Birdhi Chand Pannalal, and Birdhi Chand & Sons were not includible in the income of Shri Birdhi Chand. The court did not find it necessary to answer question 3. Each party will bear their own costs. The Tribunal will be informed of the decision.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
