Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Assessment Order Invalidated Due to Procedural Error</h1> <h3>Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-12, New Delhi Versus Shri Vijay Kumar Aggarwal</h3> The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal against the CIT(A)'s decision regarding the invalidity of the assessment order for AY 2006-07. The failure to ... Validity of assessment - failure to issue notice under section 143(2) within stipulated time - whether such procedural deficiency being curable under section 292 BB ? - Held that:- Undisputedly, notice u/s 143(2) of the Act should have been issued and served on or before 30.6.2007 as the return of income for the relevant AY 2006-07 was filed on 15.6.2006 but the same was issued on 12.11.2007 and served on 14.11.2007 and the same was issued and served beyond the prescribed time limit as per proviso to section 143(2) of the Act. In this situation, we reach to a logical conclusion that the CIT(A) was right in holding that section 292BB of the Act is not applicable to the present case and omission on the part of AO to issue notice u/s 143(2) of the Act within prescribed time limit is not a procedural irregularity and the same is not curable, therefore, the CIT(A) was justified in holding that the assessment made without notice u/s 143(2) of the Act within prescribed limit was void ab initio. Decided against revenue. Issues Involved:Appeal against order of CIT(A)-I for AY 2006-07 - Failure to issue notice under section 143(2) of Income Tax Act within stipulated time - Assessment order declared void ab initio - Applicability of section 292BB of Income Tax Act - Procedural irregularity - Relief granted to the assessee - Legal and factual grounds raised by the revenue.Analysis:1. Failure to Issue Notice under Section 143(2) within Stipulated Time:The appeal was filed by the revenue against the order of CIT(A)-I for AY 2006-07, challenging the declaration of the assessment order as void ab initio due to the failure to issue notice under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act within the prescribed time limit. The revenue contended that the AO was unable to issue the notice within the stipulated time due to centralization of cases. However, the CIT(A) held that the defect was not curable under section 292BB of the Act. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A) and dismissed the appeal, upholding that the omission to issue the notice within the prescribed time was not a procedural irregularity and was not curable.2. Applicability of Section 292BB of Income Tax Act:The revenue argued that the procedural irregularity of not issuing the notice under section 143(2) within the stipulated time was curable under section 292BB of the Act. However, the Tribunal noted that section 292BB was not applicable to the case for AY 2006-07, as it was inserted by the Finance Act, 2008, effective from 1.4.2008. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that section 292BB did not apply to the assessment completed in 2007, and the omission to issue the notice within the prescribed time was not a curable procedural defect.3. Relief Granted to the Assessee:The Tribunal referred to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in ACIT vs. Hotel Blue Moon, emphasizing that the requirement of notice under section 143(2) cannot be dispensed with. The CIT(A) allowed relief to the assessee based on this judgment, stating that the assessment made without the notice u/s 143(2) in time was void ab initio. The Tribunal concurred with this view, upholding the CIT(A)'s decision and dismissing the revenue's appeal on the grounds that the assessment order was invalid due to the failure to issue the notice within the prescribed time limit.4. Legal and Factual Grounds Raised by the Revenue:The revenue raised various legal and factual grounds challenging the CIT(A)'s decision. However, the Tribunal carefully considered the arguments presented by both sides and ultimately upheld the CIT(A)'s order, emphasizing that the omission to issue the notice under section 143(2) within the prescribed time rendered the assessment order void ab initio, and the procedural irregularity was not curable under the provisions of the Income Tax Act.In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal and affirmed the decision of the CIT(A) regarding the invalidity of the assessment order due to the failure to issue the notice under section 143(2) within the stipulated time, highlighting the non-curability of this procedural defect under the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found