1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Supreme Court dismisses special leave petition for lack of legal grounds</h1> The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition in the case as no legal grounds for interference were identified. - [2015] 373 ITR 681 (SC) Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - search under section 132 wherein the assessee made voluntary disclosure under section 132(4) disclosing a sum of βΉ 6 crores even though no incriminating document suggesting any such undisclosed income was found - ITAT deleted penalty levy - HC [2015 (5) TMI 317 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT] held that as it is in that sense a voluntary disclosure which has been clarified by the assessee by stating in answer to question No. 23 that he had not given any statement under pressure and he did not want to rectify or modify the statement made by him. Thus the order of the Tribunal is unsustainable in law and, therefore, is set aside - Held that:- No legal and valid ground for interference. The special leave petition is dismissed. - Decided against assessee. The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition as no legal grounds were found for interference. The citation is 2015 (8) TMI 477 - SC.