CESTAT AHMEDABAD: Revenue's appeal on service tax demand from foreign company abroad during 2001-2003 rejected The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD rejected the Revenue's appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) order regarding the demand for service tax on ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
CESTAT AHMEDABAD: Revenue's appeal on service tax demand from foreign company abroad during 2001-2003 rejected
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD rejected the Revenue's appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) order regarding the demand for service tax on services provided by a foreign company abroad during 2001-2003. The Commissioner (Appeals) overturned the adjudication order citing the liability for service tax from foreign companies in India under Section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994.
The Revenue's appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) order was rejected by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD. The demand of service tax was raised for services rendered by a foreign company abroad during 2001-2003. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the adjudication order based on the introduction of liability for service tax from foreign companies in India under Section 66A of Finance Act, 1994.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.