Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether fixing of profile-safety steel barrier at a hazardous location on National Highway No. 8 was a work contract relating to roads so as to qualify for the exemption granted.
Analysis: The exemption certificate and the notification were read as covering work relating to roads, and the expression "relating to" was given a broad meaning. Safety measures installed on a national highway, including profile-safety steel barriers at toll plazas, were treated as integral to modern road construction and road safety. Once the work was found to be part of the road, the remaining questions did not survive for separate consideration. The plea based on Rule 14 was rejected because no fraud or misrepresentation was established and the authorities below had recorded a consistent factual finding in favour of the assessee.
Conclusion: The work was held to relate to roads and the exemption was upheld in favour of the assessee.