Tribunal dismisses Revenue's appeal for 2001-02, disallows some expenses.

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal for the assessment year 2001-02 due to low tax effect. Disallowances of commission, telephone, vehicle running, and maintenance expenses were deleted for both assessment years 2001-02 and 2003-04. Disallowance of freight and cartage expenses was upheld for 2001-02 but deemed reasonable for 2003-04. Disallowance of consumable stores expenses was upheld for 2001-02 but deleted for 2003-04. The disallowance of depreciation on machinery for 2003-04 was upheld. Overall, the appeals and cross-objections were partly allowed and dismissed accordingly.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Maintainability of Revenue's appeal for assessment year 2001-02 due to low tax effect.
2. Disallowance of commission expenses for assessment years 2001-02 and 2003-04.
3. Disallowance of telephone expenses for assessment years 2001-02 and 2003-04.
4. Disallowance of freight and cartage (outward) expenses for assessment years 2001-02 and 2003-04.
5. Disallowance of vehicle running and maintenance expenses for assessment years 2001-02 and 2003-04.
6. Disallowance of consumable stores expenses for assessment years 2001-02 and 2003-04.
7. Disallowance of previous period items for assessment year 2001-02.
8. Allowance of unabsorbed depreciation for assessment year 2001-02.
9. Disallowance of depreciation on machinery for assessment year 2003-04.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Maintainability of Revenue's Appeal for Assessment Year 2001-02:
The tax effect in the Revenue's appeal for assessment year 2001-02 was less than Rs. 4 lacs, making it not maintainable as per the Board's instructions. Consequently, the appeal of the Revenue for this year was dismissed.

2. Disallowance of Commission Expenses:
For assessment years 2001-02 and 2003-04, the assessee contested the disallowance of Rs. 50,000 and Rs. 1,00,000 respectively, while the Revenue contested the reduction of disallowance from Rs. 2,00,000 to Rs. 1,00,000 in 2003-04. The Tribunal found that the disallowances were ad hoc and without basis, as the Assessing Officer did not specify any particular evidence that was lacking. Therefore, the Tribunal deleted the entire disallowance of commission expenses for both years.

3. Disallowance of Telephone Expenses:
The assessee challenged the disallowance of Rs. 47,345.85 and Rs. 67,338.53 for assessment years 2001-02 and 2003-04 respectively. The Revenue contested the reduction of disallowance from Rs. 1,80,000 to 7.5% of the total expenses. The Tribunal, referencing the judgment of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in Sayaji Iron and Engg. Co. vs. CIT, held that personal use of telephone by directors/employees should be included in their perquisites and not disallowed in the company's hands. Thus, the entire disallowance was deleted.

4. Disallowance of Freight and Cartage (Outward) Expenses:
The assessee disputed the disallowance of Rs. 4,97,064.75 and Rs. 7,73,610.15 for assessment years 2001-02 and 2003-04 respectively, while the Revenue contested the reduction of disallowance from Rs. 15,47,220 to 15% of the expenses. The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer's disallowance of 30% of the expenses due to the abnormal increase in expenses and the fact that most payments were made in cash and were not verifiable. Therefore, the disallowance for assessment year 2001-02 was upheld, and the disallowance for 2003-04 was deemed reasonable.

5. Disallowance of Vehicle Running and Maintenance Expenses:
The assessee contested the disallowance of Rs. 1,89,042.30 and Rs. 1,05,130 for assessment years 2001-02 and 2003-04 respectively. The Revenue contested the reduction of disallowance from Rs. 2,62,825 to 10% of the expenses. The Tribunal, following the judgment in Sayaji Iron and Engg. Co., held that personal use of vehicles by directors/employees should be included in their perquisites and not disallowed in the company's hands. Thus, the entire disallowance was deleted.

6. Disallowance of Consumable Stores Expenses:
The assessee challenged the disallowance of Rs. 1,31,60,083 and Rs. 1,14,31,332 for assessment years 2001-02 and 2003-04 respectively. The Revenue contested the reduction of disallowance from Rs. 2,28,62,664 to 5% of the expenses. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance for assessment year 2001-02 due to the abnormal increase in expenses and lack of verifiable evidence. However, for assessment year 2003-04, the Tribunal found the increase in expenses reasonable compared to the turnover increase and deleted the disallowance.

7. Disallowance of Previous Period Items:
The assessee did not press this ground, and thus, the ground was rejected as not pressed.

8. Allowance of Unabsorbed Depreciation:
The Tribunal found that this issue was not arising out of the order of the CIT(A) and thus did not call for any adjudication. Therefore, the ground was rejected.

9. Disallowance of Depreciation on Machinery:
The assessee contested the disallowance of Rs. 11,000 for assessment year 2003-04. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance as the assessee failed to produce the bill for the cost of the machinery addition.

Conclusion:
- Appeals of the assessee for assessment years 2001-02 and 2003-04 were partly allowed.
- Appeal of the Revenue for assessment year 2001-02 was dismissed.
- Appeal of the Revenue for assessment year 2003-04 was partly allowed.
- Both Cross Objections of the assessee were dismissed.

---