Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Approval of Amalgamation Scheme without Shareholder Meetings</h1> <h3>In Re: Ganraj Sugars Private Limited, Pukhraj Sugars Private Limited, Jivitesh Sugars Private Limited, Parashar Sugars Private Limited, Ritesh Vyapaar Private Limited, Hindon Projects Private Limited, Ojas Industries Private Limited</h3> The court dispensed with the requirement of convening meetings of equity shareholders, preference shareholders, and creditors after examining consents/no ... Scheme of Amalgamation - Dispensing convening of meetings of equity shareholders, preference shareholders, secured and unsecured creditors to consider and approve, proposed Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 – Held that:- Board of Directors of transferor companies no. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 and transferee company in their separate meetings respectively have unanimously approved proposed Scheme of Amalgamation – Consents/no objections of equity shareholders and preference shareholders of all the transferor companies were found in order – Application stands allowed – Decided in favour of applicants. Issues Involved:1. Requirement of convening meetings of equity shareholders, preference shareholders, secured and unsecured creditors.2. Examination of consents/no objections from shareholders and creditors.3. Approval of the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation.4. Share exchange ratio.5. Pending proceedings under Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956.6. Unanimous approval by the Board of Directors.Detailed Analysis:1. Requirement of Convening Meetings:The applicant companies sought directions from the court to dispense with the requirement of convening meetings of their equity shareholders, preference shareholders, secured and unsecured creditors to consider and approve the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. The court examined the consents/no objections submitted by the shareholders and creditors of the transferor and transferee companies.2. Examination of Consents/No Objections:The court noted that the consents/no objections from the equity shareholders, preference shareholders, and creditors of the transferor companies (Ganraj Sugars Private Limited, Pukhraj Sugars Private Limited, Jivitesh Sugars Private Limited, Parashar Sugars Private Limited, Ritesh Vyapaar Private Limited, and Hindon Projects Private Limited) and the transferee company (Ojas Industries Private Limited) were placed on record and found in order. This allowed the court to dispense with the requirement of convening meetings.3. Approval of the Proposed Scheme of Amalgamation:The proposed Scheme of Amalgamation aimed to achieve better financial structuring, securitize debts, economize administrative costs, and achieve better administration, operations, and management by consolidation and restructuring. The court found the scheme to be in order and approved it based on the consents/no objections received.4. Share Exchange Ratio:The Scheme provided specific share exchange ratios for the shareholders of the transferor companies. For example, '06 fully paid-up equity shares of Rs. 10/- each of the transferee company for every 01 fully paid-up equity share of Rs. 10/- each held in the transferor company no. 1.' Similar ratios were detailed for the other transferor companies.5. Pending Proceedings under Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956:The applicants submitted that no proceedings under Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 were pending against the applicant companies. This was noted by the court as part of its consideration.6. Unanimous Approval by the Board of Directors:The Board of Directors of the transferor companies and the transferee company unanimously approved the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation in their respective meetings. Copies of the resolutions passed were placed on record and considered by the court.Conclusion:The court allowed the application, dispensing with the requirement of convening meetings of the equity shareholders, preference shareholders, and creditors based on the consents/no objections received. The proposed Scheme of Amalgamation was approved, and the application was allowed in the aforesaid terms.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found