TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Delhi HC sets aside CESTAT extension order citing Income Tax Act provision</h1> The Delhi HC set aside a CESTAT order extending an interim order for a respondent assessee, citing a provision limiting such extensions under the Income ... Extension of stay order - Power of tribunal to extend stay beyond the period of 365 days - Held that:- Tribunal is bound by the provision and that the power to extend such interim orders is dependent on the exercise of discretion by the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. In these circumstances, the impugned order cannot be sustained - Decision in the case of CIT v. Maruti Suzuki (India) Ltd. [2014 (2) TMI 1037 - DELHI HIGH COURT] followed - Decided in favour of Revenue. The Delhi High Court challenged a Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) order extending an interim order for a respondent assessee. The Court noted a similar case involving the Income Tax Act, where the Tribunal was bound by a provision limiting extension of interim orders. The impugned order was not sustained, but the Revenue was restrained from taking coercive action for four weeks to allow the respondent to move the Court under Article 226 of the Constitution if needed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
