Appellants win cenvat credit case for Additional Customs Duty via DEPB scrips

The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that they were entitled to cenvat credit for Additional Customs Duty paid through DEPB scrips under different Foreign Trade Policies. The Tribunal considered legal precedents and judgments, including a decision from the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court, supporting the admissibility of cenvat credit under the relevant notifications. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Department's objections, allowing the appeals and providing relief to the appellants.

---

---

Issues:
1. Eligibility of cenvat credit for Additional Customs Duty paid through DEPB scrips under different Foreign Trade Policies.

Analysis:
The judgment involves two appeals concerning the eligibility of cenvat credit for Additional Customs Duty paid through DEPB scrips by manufacturers of MCBs. The Department contended that since the duty was paid under DEPB scrips issued under the 2002-2007 Foreign Trade Policy, the appellants were not entitled to cenvat credit under notification no.96/2004-Cus, which required DEPB scrips issued under the 2004-2009 Foreign Trade Policy. Additionally, the Department raised similar objections for imports made under notification no.34/97-Cus. The Assistant Commissioner/Joint Commissioner confirmed cenvat credit demands against the appellants, leading to these appeals.

The appellant's counsel argued that cenvat credit should be allowed based on previous Tribunal orders and a judgment from the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court. The Tribunal considered the submissions and examined the relevant notifications and legal precedents. The judgment highlighted the decision of the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of Neel Kanth Rubber Mills, which supported the appellant's position regarding the admissibility of cenvat credit under notification no.96/2004-Cus. The Tribunal also referenced its own Final Order in the appellant's previous case, which allowed cenvat credit for imports under notification no.34/97-Cus.

Ultimately, the Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, citing the legal precedents and judgments discussed during the proceedings. The Tribunal concluded that the objections raised by the Department regarding the eligibility of cenvat credit for Additional Customs Duty paid through DEPB scrips under different Foreign Trade Policies were not valid. As a result, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed, granting relief to the appellants.

---