ITAT Pune Dismisses Revenue's Appeal on Tax Limit; Bombay High Court Confirms Revised Instructions

The ITAT Pune dismissed the Revenue's appeal due to the tax effect being below the prescribed limit set by the CBDT's Instructions. The Bombay High Court's rulings confirmed the applicability of revised Instructions to pending cases, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal. Additionally, the ITAT Pune directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 2,55,000 under section 68 of the Act, as it was sourced from savings and agricultural income. The ITAT also instructed the Assessing Officer to verify and compute long term capital gains based on the indexation of the cost of acquisition, providing the assessee with a reasonable opportunity to be heard.

---

---

Issues:
1. Maintainability of cross-appeals due to tax effect below prescribed limit.
2. Applicability of revised Instructions by CBDT to pending appeals.
3. Addition under section 68 of the Act for cash deposits.
4. Indexation of cost of acquisition for long term capital gains.

Issue 1: Maintainability of cross-appeals:
The ITAT Pune heard cross-appeals against the CIT(A)-II, Nashik's order for assessment year 2008-09. The tax effect in the Revenue's appeal was below Rs. 4 lakhs, making it non-maintainable according to Instruction No.5 of 2014 by the CBDT. The issue was whether revised Instructions applied to pending appeals. The Bombay High Court's rulings established that such Instructions were applicable to pending cases as well, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal.

Issue 2: Applicability of revised Instructions:
The ITAT Pune considered whether Instructions by the CBDT, setting a monetary limit for filing appeals, applied to pending cases. Relying on the Bombay High Court's decisions, it concluded that the revised Instructions were applicable to both new and pending appeals. Therefore, the revised Instruction No.5 of 2014, limiting appeals to tax effects exceeding Rs. 4 lakhs, was applied to dismiss the Revenue's appeal.

Issue 3: Addition under section 68 of the Act:
Regarding the addition of Rs. 2,55,000 under section 68 of the Act for cash deposits, the ITAT Pune analyzed the source of these funds. While the CIT(A) had accepted Rs. 10 lakhs as sale proceeds, the remaining amount was claimed to be from savings and agricultural proceeds. After considering the evidence and explanations, the ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 2,55,000, as it was sourced from savings and agricultural income.

Issue 4: Indexation of cost of acquisition:
The ITAT Pune addressed the dispute over the indexation of the cost of acquisition for long term capital gains. The assessee argued for bifurcated figures based on land purchase and building construction in different financial years. Due to lack of detailed records, the ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to verify and compute the long term capital gain accordingly, providing a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to be heard.

In conclusion, the ITAT Pune allowed the assessee's appeal and dismissed the Revenue's appeal, pronouncing the order on February 13, 2015.

---