Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal denies duty exemption for replicated Microsoft software CDs/DVDs under Notification No. 6/2006-CE.</h1> <h3>Sony Dadc Manufacturing India Pvt Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Belapur</h3> The Tribunal denied duty exemption for replicated Microsoft software CDs/DVDs under Notification No. 6/2006-CE, ruling that the software did not qualify ... Manufacture - replicating certain Microsoft software on CDs/DVDs - Benefit of serial No. 27 of Notification No. 6/2006-CE - Held that:- Applicant does not have any case on merits as the work of replicating and that also in large quantity, will not be relating to a customized software. It is not under dispute that such software has been developed by the Microsoft and are used in computer system by various original equipment manufacturers or other customers. In such a situation, the software cannot be called customized software so as to extend the benefit of Notification 6/2006-CE dated 01/03/2006. In view of the said position, prima facie, we are of the view that the applicant will be required to pay duty on the said goods. However, the question comes what would be the value for computation of duty. It appears that the Revenue has added US $ 7/- per disc for computing the duty. The figure of US $7/- has been taken as that is the royalty that is required to be paid by the Authorised Replicators/OEM to the Microsoft for the main software. Similarly, recovery disc is provided to OEM manufacturer so that in case of any problem in the original software, recovery disc is used. Similar is the position in respect of other type of discs other than works. In case of Works, it appears that the same royalty is indirectly paid to the Mircrosoft. - stay granted partly. Issues:1. Interpretation of Notification No. 6/2006-CE regarding duty exemption for replicated Microsoft software on CDs/DVDs.2. Determination of the value for computation of duty based on royalty payment.Analysis:1. The case involved the interpretation of Notification No. 6/2006-CE concerning the duty exemption for certain types of CDs/DVDs replicating Microsoft software. The applicant claimed duty exemption under serial No. 27 of the notification, while the Revenue contended that the goods did not fall under the said entry as it covered customized software excluding packaged or canned software. The Tribunal observed that replicating Microsoft software in large quantities did not constitute customized software. The software developed by Microsoft and used by various manufacturers could not be considered customized, thus not qualifying for the duty exemption under the notification. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the applicant would be required to pay duty on the replicated goods.2. Regarding the computation of duty value, the Revenue had added US $7 per disc based on the royalty paid to Microsoft by Authorized Replicators/OEM for the main software. The applicant argued that the US $7 royalty was not specific to the first five types of discs but was a general royalty for various Microsoft operating systems. The discs were provided as free supplies, such as upgraded discs for original software purchasers and recovery discs for OEM manufacturers. The Tribunal acknowledged the contentious nature of the royalty amount and directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 50 lakhs within eight weeks for further consideration during the final hearing. The decision on the royalty amount would be determined after a thorough examination of all relevant facts and circumstances.In conclusion, the Tribunal ruled against the duty exemption claim for replicated Microsoft software CDs/DVDs under Notification No. 6/2006-CE due to the nature of the software not meeting the criteria for customized software. The determination of the royalty amount for computing duty was deferred for detailed examination during the final hearing, with the appellant instructed to deposit a specified amount pending further proceedings.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found