Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Manufacturing lottery terminals from CKD kits deemed taxable under Central Excise Act. Upheld demand and penalties.</h1> <h3>M/s Leo Circuit Boards, Pvt Ltd, Shri Sudesh Rao, M/s Pan India Network Infravest Pvt Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Belapur</h3> M/s Leo Circuit Boards, Pvt Ltd, Shri Sudesh Rao, M/s Pan India Network Infravest Pvt Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Belapur - 2015 (330) ... Issues Involved:1. Whether the assembly of lottery terminals from CKD kits amounts to manufacture under the Central Excise Act.2. Classification of the lottery terminals under the correct tariff heading.3. Applicability of excise duty on the assembled lottery terminals.4. Whether the assembled lottery terminals were exported.5. Applicability of the extended period for demand and imposition of penalties.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Assembly of Lottery Terminals as Manufacture:The primary issue was whether the assembly of lottery terminals from CKD kits constitutes 'manufacture' under the Central Excise Act. The appellant argued that the activity did not amount to manufacture as the imported goods were complete and finished, merely requiring assembly using simple tools. They cited several case laws to support their claim that such assembly does not amount to manufacture. However, the Tribunal found that the assembly of 114 components, including power supply, motherboard, LCD, and keyboard, clearly amounted to manufacture. The Tribunal referred to Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, which includes any process incidental or ancillary to the completion of a manufactured product as manufacture. The Tribunal concluded that converting various components into a complete lottery terminal is undoubtedly manufacture.2. Classification of Lottery Terminals:The Tribunal addressed the discrepancy in the classification of lottery terminals. The adjudicating authority had classified the goods under heading 85421090, while the Tribunal had a prima facie view that they should be classified under 84709010. In the denovo adjudication, the Commissioner confirmed the classification under 84709010, which the Tribunal upheld, stating that the assembly of various components into a complete unit of lottery terminals amounts to manufacture and is an excisable product.3. Applicability of Excise Duty:The Tribunal upheld the demand for Central Excise duty of Rs. 1,59,47,997/- and the imposition of a penalty of an equal amount under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, read with Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal agreed with the Revenue's contention that the assembly of CKD parts into lottery terminals constitutes manufacture and is liable for excise duty. The Tribunal also dismissed the appellant's reliance on Rule 2(A) of the General Rules for Interpretation, stating that it is only for the purpose of charging customs duty and not for interpreting the term 'manufacture' in Central Excise.4. Export of Assembled Lottery Terminals:The appellant claimed that the assembled lottery terminals were exported, and thus, there was no malafide intention. However, the Tribunal found that the appellant failed to produce any documentary evidence, such as export invoices or shipping bills, to substantiate this claim. Therefore, the Tribunal rejected the appellant's claim regarding the export of the goods.5. Applicability of Extended Period and Penalties:The Tribunal upheld the invocation of the extended period under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, as the appellant had previously cleared the same assembled lottery terminals on payment of excise duty but failed to do so for the 1500 lottery terminals involved in this case. The Tribunal found that the appellant had suppressed the fact of manufacture and removal of these lottery terminals without payment of duty from the department, indicating an intention to evade payment of excise duty. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the imposition of penalties on the appellant and the other parties involved.Conclusion:The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, upholding the impugned order that confirmed the demand for Central Excise duty and imposed penalties. The Tribunal concluded that the activity of assembling lottery terminals from various imported components amounts to manufacture and is liable for excise duty. The Tribunal also found no merit in the appellant's claims regarding the export of goods and the applicability of the extended period and penalties. The stay applications were also disposed of accordingly.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found