TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court dismisses appeal under Section 35L(b) of Central Excise Act, directs filing in High Court.</h1> <h3>Commnr. of Central Excise Versus Raj Petroleum Products & Others</h3> The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act, directing the appellant to file the appeal before the High Court ... Denial of CENVAT Credit - Clandestine removal of goods - Maintainability of appeal before the High Court - Held that:- The appeal on the aforesaid aspects is not maintainable under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act and in fact it could have been filed under 35-G of the said Act before the High Court. This is a preliminary objection taken by the respondent in its counter affidavit to the present appeal and the objection is sustainable. Having regard thereto, we dismiss these appeals as not maintainable giving liberty to the appellant prefer the appeal before the High Court. - Decided against Revenue. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act and directed the appellant to prefer the appeal before the High Court within one month. The High Court was requested to decide the appeal expeditiously.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
