TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court upholds Tribunal decision on society registration under section 12A.</h1> <h3>The Commissioner of Income Tax, Belgaum Versus Karnataka Lingayat Education Society</h3> The Commissioner of Income Tax, Belgaum Versus Karnataka Lingayat Education Society - [2015] 371 ITR 249 (Kar) Issues Involved:1. Whether the donations received by the society were capitation fees.2. Whether the society's activities were genuine and in accordance with its charitable objects.3. Whether the society's running of hostels and hospitals constituted commercial activities.4. Whether the cancellation of the society's registration under section 12A was justified.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Donations as Capitation Fees:The Revenue contended that donations received by the society were essentially capitation fees for admissions to KLE University. The Assessing Officer, upon scrutiny, believed that there was a direct nexus between the donations and admissions. However, the society argued that the donations were voluntary and not linked to admissions. The Tribunal found no evidence of donations being capitation fees and concluded that the donations did not affect the society's charitable status.2. Genuineness and Accordance with Charitable Objects:The Revenue argued that the society's activities were not genuine and deviated from its charitable objects, suggesting a profit motive. The society countered by stating that it was engaged in providing education through numerous institutions and that all activities, including running hostels and hospitals, were incidental to its educational purpose. The Tribunal determined that the society adhered to its charitable objectives and that its activities were genuine.3. Commercial Activities - Hostels and Hospitals:The Revenue asserted that the society's operation of hostels and hospitals was commercial in nature, disqualifying it from being a charitable institution. The society maintained that these facilities were integral to its educational mission, providing necessary support to students and staff. The Tribunal agreed with the society, noting that such activities were incidental to its educational purpose and did not constitute commercial activities.4. Justification for Cancellation of Registration:The Revenue issued a show-cause notice and subsequently cancelled the society's registration under section 12A, citing non-genuine activities and deviation from charitable purposes. The society challenged this, arguing that it met all conditions for charitable status and that the cancellation was unwarranted. The Tribunal found no violation of conditions warranting cancellation and restored the society's registration.Conclusion:The High Court affirmed the Tribunal's decision, holding that:- The donations could not be construed as capitation fees.- Providing hostels and hospitals was incidental to the society's educational objectives.- The society and KLE University, despite overlapping management, were separate legal entities.- There was no violation of conditions under the Income-tax Act justifying the cancellation of registration.Order:The appeal by the Revenue was rejected, and the Tribunal's decision to restore the society's registration was upheld.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
