Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court upholds assessee's deduction under Section 80-IA, dismissing appeal.</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Income Tax Versus M/s. Kongoor Textile Process, Tirupur</h3> Commissioner of Income Tax Versus M/s. Kongoor Textile Process, Tirupur - [2015] 377 ITR 559 (Mad) Issues Involved:1. Entitlement to claim deduction under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act.2. Applicability of previous judicial decisions on the current case.3. Interpretation of Section 80-IA, especially sub-sections (1), (2), (4), and (5).4. Treatment of losses and deductions set off in previous years.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Entitlement to Claim Deduction under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act:The core issue in this appeal is whether the respondent/assessee is entitled to claim deduction under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal had ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction. The High Court examined whether this decision was legally correct.2. Applicability of Previous Judicial Decisions on the Current Case:The High Court referenced its earlier decision in Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills Vs Asst. CIT [2012) 340 ITR 477], where it was held that once losses and other deductions have been set off against the income of previous years, they should not be reopened for the purpose of computing current year income under Section 80-IA. The Revenue's counsel noted that appeals against this decision were pending before the Supreme Court, but the High Court found no compelling reason to deviate from its earlier stance.3. Interpretation of Section 80-IA, Especially Sub-sections (1), (2), (4), and (5):The High Court delved into the detailed provisions of Section 80-IA, particularly focusing on sub-sections (1), (2), (4), and (5). It highlighted that:- Sub-section (1) allows a deduction of 100% of profits and gains derived from eligible business for ten consecutive assessment years.- Sub-section (2) provides the assessee the option to choose any ten consecutive assessment years out of fifteen years.- Sub-section (4) defines the eligible business.- Sub-section (5) emphasizes that the profits and gains of eligible business should be computed as if such business were the only source of income for the assessee during the relevant assessment years.4. Treatment of Losses and Deductions Set Off in Previous Years:The High Court reiterated its position from Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills that losses and deductions set off in previous years should not be brought forward notionally. It cited the Rajasthan High Court's decision in CIT v. Mewar Oil and General Mills Ltd., which held that it is not required to reopen losses or deductions already set off against previous years' income for computing current income under Section 80-IA.Conclusion:The High Court dismissed the appeal, confirming the Tribunal's order and ruling in favor of the assessee. It held that the assessee's business undertaking, which had already set off its losses against other income, was entitled to the deduction under Section 80-IA. The Court found no distinction in facts from the Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills case and saw no reason to take a different view.Final Judgment:The Tax Case (Appeal) was dismissed, and the questions of law were answered against the Revenue and in favor of the assessee. The High Court confirmed the Tribunal's order, allowing the deduction under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found