Pre-deposit waiver in import undervaluation dispute limited by prima facie evidence of dummy firms and misdeclaration.

In an interim stay application involving alleged undervaluation and misdeclaration in import transactions, the Tribunal noted prima facie material that the imports were routed through dummy firms controlled by the same person, allowing the corporate veil to be lifted for liability assessment. It also relied on contemporaneous evidence, including NIDB data and statements, to indicate misdeclaration of value and description. The plea that there was no material for undervaluation and that the demand was time barred was not accepted at this stage. Full waiver of pre-deposit was declined, but partial stay relief was granted subject to substantial deposit and compliance.

---

---

Issues: Whether waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery could be granted in a case involving alleged undervaluation and misdeclaration in import transactions.

Analysis: The order records a prima facie finding that the imports were routed through dummy firms controlled by the same person, that the corporate veil could be lifted for the purpose of assessing liability, and that contemporaneous evidence, including NIDB data and statements, indicated misdeclaration of value and description. On that basis, the plea that there was no material for undervaluation and that the demand was time barred was not accepted at the interim stage. The Tribunal nevertheless granted only partial relief by requiring substantial pre-deposit and staying the balance demand subject to compliance.

Conclusion: Full waiver of pre-deposit was declined. Partial stay relief was granted on condition of deposit.

---