Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether butter and ghee sold under a brand name registered under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 continued to attract the reduced tax rate of 10% for the assessment year 1998-99 notwithstanding the substitution of Entry 8 in Part D of the First Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959.
Analysis: Entry 8 of Part D of the First Schedule initially covered butter and ghee sold under a brand name and the rate of tax was reduced to 10% by Notification No. II(1)/CTRE/22(a-2)/97 dated 05.03.1997 issued under Section 17(1) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. Though the entry was substituted with effect from 04.05.1998 to refer to butter and ghee sold under a brand name registered under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958, the substituted entry itself did not displace the benefit of the earlier notification. The later erratum also showed that the 10% reduction remained applicable until the change took effect, and the Tribunal had failed to give effect to the entry and notification as they stood for the relevant period.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to tax at 10% on the disputed turnover, and the demand at 11% was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a taxing entry and a valid rate-reducing notification operate for the relevant period, a subsequent substitution of the entry does not defeat the reduced rate unless the later amendment clearly withdraws or excludes that benefit.