Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Rebate Claims Dispute: Procedural Compliance vs. Substantive Benefit

        POLYPLEX CORPORATION LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOM & CENTRAL EXCISE MEERUT-II

        POLYPLEX CORPORATION LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOM & CENTRAL EXCISE MEERUT-II - 2014 (311) E.L.T. 923 (G. O. I.) Issues Involved:
        1. Rejection of part rebate claims due to non-submission of original ARE-2 forms.
        2. Compliance with procedural requirements for rebate claims.
        3. Substantive vs. procedural conditions in rebate claims.
        4. Entitlement to rebate claims based on evidence of export and duty-paid status.

        Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

        1. Rejection of part rebate claims due to non-submission of original ARE-2 forms:
        The applicants, engaged in manufacturing various films and availing area-based exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-C.E., filed rebate claims for Central Excise duty paid on goods used in the manufacture of exported goods. The adjudicating authority partially sanctioned the rebate amount but rejected part of it due to the non-submission of original ARE-2 forms, relying instead on photocopies. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this decision, leading to the filing of revision applications by the applicants.

        2. Compliance with procedural requirements for rebate claims:
        The applicants argued that they had submitted the original and duplicate copies of ARE-2 forms duly signed by Customs Authorities along with the rebate claims. They contended that the Commissioner (Appeals) ignored the standing instructions in the C.B.E. & C.'s Excise Manual, which should have been considered. The applicants cited that the goods were indeed exported, and the rebate of duty was claimed as per input-output norms fixed by the Assistant Commissioner.

        3. Substantive vs. procedural conditions in rebate claims:
        The applicants emphasized that the substantial benefit of rebate should not be denied due to procedural lapses. They cited the Supreme Court judgments in CST, UP v. Auriya Chamber of Commerce, Allahabad and Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. v. Dy. Commissioner, which distinguish between substantive and procedural conditions. The Supreme Court held that non-observance of procedural conditions is condonable, whereas substantive conditions are not.

        4. Entitlement to rebate claims based on evidence of export and duty-paid status:
        The Government, upon reviewing the case records and submissions, noted that the rebate claims were otherwise in order, as the use of duty-paid inputs in the manufacture of exported goods was not disputed. The proof of export was available through Customs endorsements on shipping bills and duplicate ARE-2 forms. The applicants relied on the Bombay High Court judgment in UM Cables v. UOI, which held that non-production of original ARE-1 forms does not invalidate rebate claims if cogent evidence of export and duty-paid status is provided.

        The Government concluded that the applicants were entitled to the rebate claims as the deficiency of non-availability of original ARE-2 forms was procedural. The rebate claims were admissible since the use of duty-paid inputs and export of goods were established through certified documents. The original authority was directed to sanction the rebate claims if they were otherwise found in order. The impugned orders were modified accordingly, and the revision applications were allowed in these terms.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found