1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Property conversion without valid document not taxable as capital gains. Registered document essential for transfers exceeding Rs.100.</h1> The High Court held that the conversion of individual property into partnership property without a valid registered transfer document does not constitute ... Capital Gains Issues:1. Whether the conversion of individual property into partnership property constitutes a transfer for tax assessment purposesRs.2. Whether a valid registered document of transfer is necessary to attract tax on capital gainsRs.Analysis:The judgment pertains to an assessee who transferred property to a partnership firm and claimed that the profit derived was not assessable to tax as capital gains. The Income-tax Officer held the profit to be taxable, but the Appellate Assistant Commissioner ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the transfer was not valid as it was not done through a registered document. The Revenue appealed to the Appellate Tribunal, arguing that registration was not required for such transfers. The Tribunal provided two reasons for its decision: firstly, the absence of a registered document meant no valid transfer occurred, and secondly, converting individual property into partnership property did not involve a transfer. The High Court agreed with the first reasoning, emphasizing that a registered document is necessary for property transfers valued over Rs. 100. Therefore, since there was no valid registered transfer document, the High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision that there was no liability for tax on capital gains. The High Court declined to address the second reason provided by the Tribunal regarding the nature of the conversion, as it was deemed complex. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the tax case petition, affirming the Tribunal's decision and emphasizing the importance of a registered transfer document for tax assessment purposes.