Seized cash can offset advance tax liability, interest exemptions apply.

The Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision that the seized cash could have been adjusted against advance tax liability, negating the application of interest under Section-234A, 234B & 234C. The department's appeal was dismissed at the admission stage, with the Court referencing relevant case law supporting the assessee's position that seized cash could be used to pay advance tax liability, especially when the department did not respond to adjustment requests.

---

---

Issues:
- Appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding interest charged under Section-234A, 234B & 234C of the Act on cash seized during a search and seizure operation.
- Interpretation of Section-132B(1) of the Act regarding the appropriation of seized assets against liabilities.
- Justification of charging interest for non-payment of advance tax when cash seized was available with the department and requests for adjustment were made by the assessee.
- Comparison with relevant case laws regarding the adjustment of seized cash against advance tax liability.

Analysis:
1. The appeal was filed by the department against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal charging interest under Section-234A, 234B & 234C of the Act on cash seized during a search and seizure operation. The Tribunal had deleted the interest, stating that the cash could have been adjusted against the advance tax liability for the assessment year 2010-2011, as the cash was already in the government account before the return was filed.

2. The interpretation of Section-132B(1) of the Act was crucial in this case. The department argued that the seized cash could only be appropriated against existing liabilities, excluding advance tax. However, the assessee contended that the cash seized during the search could have been adjusted against the advance tax liability, especially when the return was filed on time and the cash was available in the department's account.

3. The assessee's representatives justified their position by highlighting that requests for adjustment of the seized cash against the advance tax liability were made multiple times, but the department did not respond or act on those requests. They argued that it was unfair to hold onto the cash in the government account and charge interest for non-payment of advance tax when the cash could have been utilized to clear the liability.

4. The comparison with relevant case laws, such as the decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in CIT Vs. Shri Jyotindra B. Modi, supported the assessee's argument that the seized cash could be used to pay advance tax liability. The Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court also ruled in favor of allowing adjustment of seized cash against advance tax liability, emphasizing that no interest should be charged if the department does not respond to such adjustment requests.

5. After a detailed hearing and examination of the facts, the Court upheld the Tribunal's order, stating that the seized cash could have been adjusted against the advance tax liability, and interest under Section-234A, 234B & 234C was not applicable in this scenario. The decision was supported by the rationale provided in the judgment, along with references to relevant case laws. The appeal filed by the department was dismissed at the admission stage, with no substantial question of law emerging from the impugned order.

---