Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal Upholds Penalty Deletion for 2007-08 Assessment Year</h1> <h3>Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle–10(1), Mumbai Versus M/s. Kodak Graphic Communication India Limited</h3> The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner's order, upholding the deletion of the penalty under section 271AA for the assessment year 2007-08. The assessee's ... Deletion of penalty levied under section 271AA - transfer pricing adjustment disallowance - Non maintenance and furnishment of the required documentation in accordance with section 92B r/w rule 10D - Held that:- it is an admitted fact that the assessee has filed its audit report in Form no.3CEB, highlighting the international transaction and has also done the bench marking of the arm’s length price in relation to the transaction undertaken with the A.E. and how such bench marking has been done after following the most appropriate method. The assessee had submitted its transfer pricing documentation vide letter dated 30th July 2010, before the Assessing Officer as well as before the Transfer Pricing Officer. The statement explaining the self–adjustments done by the company was also furnished which has been reproduced by the Transfer Pricing Officer in his order. The assessee has also complied with all the notices sent by the Transfer Pricing Officer which is evident from the Transfer Pricing Officer’s order where it is mentioned that the assessee has attended from time–to–time in respect to the notice and also submitted clarification and documents. The learned Commissioner (Appeals) has also examined the requirement of each and every clauses of rule 10D, and has come to the conclusion that clause by clause documentation required under rule 10D, has been made by the assessee not only in its transfer pricing study report but also in the documents filed before the Transfer Pricing Officer. Thus, we do not find any infirmity in such an order of the learned Commissioner (Appeals) - Decided against Revenue. Issues:Appeal against deletion of penalty under section 271AA for assessment year 2007-08.Analysis:The appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging the deletion of a penalty of &8377; 82,13,778 under section 271AA for the assessment year 2007-08. The assessee, a subsidiary of a Netherlands-based company, dealt in graphic art products and had international transactions with its associated enterprise (A.E.). The Transfer Pricing Officer suggested a higher adjustment than the assessee's self-made adjustment, leading to penalty proceedings under section 271AA by the Assessing Officer. The assessee contended that it had fulfilled all documentation requirements under rule 10D and section 92D, providing detailed submissions to support its claim. The Assessing Officer, however, imposed the penalty, prompting the appeal.Before the Commissioner (Appeals), the assessee reiterated its compliance with rule 10D, submitting detailed responses and evidence to the Transfer Pricing Officer's queries. The Commissioner analyzed the submissions, finding that the assessee had fulfilled the documentation requirements and had responded adequately to the Transfer Pricing Officer's queries. The Commissioner's detailed findings supported the assessee's position, leading to the deletion of the penalty.During the hearing, the Department Representative argued that the documentation was inadequate, relying on the Transfer Pricing Officer and Assessing Officer's orders. In contrast, the assessee's Counsel emphasized the Commissioner's findings, asserting full compliance with documentation and rule 10D. The Tribunal reviewed the contentions, examined the Commissioner's findings, and noted the assessee's compliance with documentation requirements, including filing audit reports and responding to notices. The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner's order, upholding the deletion of the penalty under section 271AA. Consequently, the Revenue's appeal was dismissed, and the penalty deletion was affirmed.In conclusion, the Tribunal's decision upheld the Commissioner's order, emphasizing the assessee's compliance with documentation requirements and ruling in favor of deleting the penalty imposed under section 271AA for the assessment year 2007-08.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found