Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act is entitled to publish the photographs of defaulting borrowers or guarantors in newspapers or magazines as a measure for recovery of secured debt.
Analysis: The SARFAESI Act and the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 empower a secured creditor to take the measures specifically authorized by statute, including action under Section 13(4) and the prescribed possession and sale procedures. Those provisions permit notice to the borrower and, in appropriate cases, notice to the public regarding the secured asset, but they do not expressly or by necessary implication authorize publication of the borrower's or guarantor's photograph. For a public authority, the test is not whether an act is merely unprohibited, but whether it is affirmatively permitted by law. In the absence of legislative sanction, publication of photographs becomes an unauthorized and extra-legal recovery method. The existence of a possible privacy issue was not decided, because the absence of statutory authority itself was sufficient to dispose of the challenge.
Conclusion: The threat to publish photographs of defaulting borrowers or guarantors is impermissible and is liable to be restrained.
Final Conclusion: The writ petitions succeeded to the limited extent of prohibiting publication of photographs, while leaving the secured creditors free to proceed in accordance with law by other permissible measures.
Ratio Decidendi: A public authority can enforce security interests only by measures expressly authorized by the governing statute and rules, and in the absence of such authorization it cannot resort to publication of a borrower's or guarantor's photograph.