Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>ITAT confirms CIT(A) decisions on unexplained cash deposits, credits, and expenses</h1> <h3>The DCIT. Circle-6, Jaipur Versus Shri Bhawani Shankar Sharma</h3> The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions on all issues, dismissing both the revenue's appeal and the assessee's cross-objections. The additions of ... Unexplained cash deposits in bank account - CIT(A) allowed part claim - Held that:- Considering order of the learned CIT(A), who had analysed the cash deposited in the bank account and withdrawal made on various dates in the both the accounts i.e. in Axix Bank and Malviya Urban Cooperative Bank, Jaipur, there is no material on record from either side to controvert the finding of the learned CIT(A), therefore, we uphold the order of the learned CIT(A). - Decided partly in favour of assessee. Ad hoc disallowances @ 20% out of expenses - Held that:- The learned CIT(A) had examined all the aspects of expenses claimed by the assessee with evidence and books of account. The appellant had not controverted the finding give by the Assessing Officer before the learned CIT(A). Therefore, we also uphold the order of the learned CIT(A) who had confirmed the addition by observing that the assessee had been provided sufficient opportunity to produce the books of account before the Assessing Officer but he failed to produce the same and had not established the genuineness of the expenses. - Decided against assessee. Issues:1. Addition of unexplained cash deposits in bank account2. Disallowance of expenses on ad hoc basis3. Confirmation of unexplained credits in bank account4. Addition of unexplained cash credit5. Confirmation of ad hoc disallowances on expensesIssue 1: Addition of unexplained cash deposits in bank accountThe Assessing Officer added unexplained cash deposits of Rs. 13,50,000 to the declared income of the assessee due to failure to explain cash withdrawals and utilization. The CIT(A) partially allowed the appeal, confirming Rs. 13,15,000 as cash deposited and Rs. 64,770 as opening cash in hand. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the revenue's appeal and the assessee's cross-objections related to this issue.Issue 2: Disallowance of expenses on ad hoc basisThe Assessing Officer disallowed expenses claimed by the assessee at Rs. 2,14,650 on an ad hoc basis of 20% due to lack of supporting documents. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance, stating that the assessee failed to produce books of account or establish the genuineness of expenses. The ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the assessee's cross-objection on this ground.Issue 3: Confirmation of unexplained credits in bank accountThe Assessing Officer treated Rs. 27,29,770 as unexplained credits in the bank account, adding it to the declared income. The CIT(A) confirmed additions of Rs. 13,15,000 for cash deposited and Rs. 64,770 for opening cash in hand. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing both the revenue's appeal and the assessee's cross-objections on these grounds.Issue 4: Addition of unexplained cash creditThe Assessing Officer added Rs. 12,02,500 as unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, as the assessee failed to provide details despite repeated opportunities. The CIT(A) confirmed this addition after considering evidence and lack of proof of genuineness. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the assessee's cross-objections related to this addition.Issue 5: Confirmation of ad hoc disallowances on expensesThe Assessing Officer disallowed expenses claimed by the assessee on an ad hoc basis of 20% due to lack of supporting documents. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance, citing non-production of books of account and failure to establish expense genuineness. The ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the assessee's cross-objection on this ground.In conclusion, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions on all issues, dismissing both the revenue's appeal and the assessee's cross-objections. The assessee's failure to provide adequate explanations and evidence led to the confirmation of various additions and disallowances by the tax authorities.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found