Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether members of a co-operative housing society, who were not parties to the arbitration agreement or the arbitral proceedings, could maintain a petition under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to challenge the arbitral award.
Analysis: Section 34 permits an application to set aside an arbitral award only by a "party", and section 2(1)(h) defines party as a party to the arbitration agreement. The scheme of the Act confines the rights of commencement, conduct, challenge, receipt of award, and limitation to parties to the arbitration agreement. A third person or outsider cannot invoke section 34 merely because the award may affect his interests. The Act contains no provision enabling grant of leave to a non-party member to step into the shoes of the society for challenging the award. The authorities relied upon by the petitioners were distinguished as arising under the Arbitration Act, 1940 or on materially different facts.
Conclusion: The petitioners, being neither parties to the arbitration agreement nor parties to the arbitration proceedings, had no locus standi to file the section 34 petition; the petition was not maintainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a challenge to an arbitral award under section 34 lies only at the instance of a party to the arbitration agreement, and a non-party cannot maintain such a challenge even if the award affects its interests.