Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revisionist corporation was liable to deduct tax at source under section 35 of the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005 on payments made for hiring buses, and whether any substantial question of law arose for interference in revision.
Analysis: Section 35 requires deduction at source at the prescribed rate where payment is made for an agreement transferring the right to use goods, including payments made by a corporation constituted under a State Act. The corporation was admittedly such a body, and the record also showed that it had sought exemption from the tax regime, which negatived any claim of exemption from compliance with the deduction obligation. The Tribunal had already granted substantial relief by reducing the penalty, and no substantial question of law was shown to justify interference.
Conclusion: The liability to deduct tax at source under section 35 was upheld and the revisionist's challenge failed.