TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Foreign gifts deemed not genuine due to lack of evidence of love/affection or donor's financial capacity.</h1> <h3>The Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar-I, Jalandhar Versus Sh. Sandeep Goyal</h3> The Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar-I, Jalandhar Versus Sh. Sandeep Goyal - [2014] 369 ITR 471 (P&H) Issues:- Appeal against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal relating to foreign gifts- Justification of accepting the genuineness of gifts totaling Rs. 9,58,759Analysis:1. The revenue appealed against the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's order regarding foreign gifts. The Tribunal remanded the transaction of Rs. 5,00,000 to the Assessing Officer, pending before the CIT(A), and not part of the current appeal.2. The appeal was admitted to consider the genuineness of gifts totaling Rs. 9,58,759. The main question was whether the Tribunal was justified in accepting these gifts from unrelated persons, as per the second substantial question of law raised.3. The assessee received foreign remittances from various donors for setting up an MRI Scan unit. The Assessing Officer doubted the genuineness of the gifts due to lack of relation between the donors and the assessee.4. The CIT(A) found the gifts from certain donors genuine based on reports and evidence. However, the gift of Rs. 5,00,000 from Pritam Singh was not accepted as genuine due to lack of close relationship and awareness about the donor's antecedents.5. Both the assessee and the revenue appealed before the Tribunal. The Tribunal confirmed the deletion of Rs. 9,58,759 but remanded the Rs. 5,00,000 transaction for reassessment. The revenue appealed against this decision.6. The High Court focused on the genuineness of the gifts, emphasizing the lack of blood relations between the assessee and the donors. Previous court judgments were cited to support the position that foreign gifts from unrelated persons are not considered genuine unless natural love and affection and financial capacity of the donor are proven.7. The High Court concluded that the foreign gifts received by the assessee were not genuine, as there was no evidence of natural love and affection or financial capacity of the donors. The appeal was allowed in favor of the revenue, upholding the decision against the assessee.
TaxTMI 