Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether credit on imported capital goods was admissible on the basis of the reconstituted Bill of Entry when duty payment was verified by Customs, and whether availment of credit beyond six months was barred.
Analysis: The duty payment on import of the capital goods was confirmed by the Customs authorities, and the receipt, installation, and use of the capital goods in manufacture of dutiable final products were not in dispute. In these circumstances, the requirement of a certified duplicate Bill of Entry did not defeat the credit when the factual basis for duty payment stood established. On the question of time limit, the six months restriction was treated as applicable to inputs and not to capital goods, consistent with the departmental circular relied upon in the record.
Conclusion: The credit was held to be admissible and the Revenue's challenge failed.