Software licensing and royalty transactions prima facie outside service tax levy, with recovery stayed pending appeal.

Software transactions structured as royalty or right-to-use arrangements were treated as prima facie outside Intellectual Property Right Services and Information Technology Software Service where the dispute concerned sale of third-party or standardised software and not transfer of copyright. The Tribunal noted the distinction between sale of software and sale of copyright, and applied the principle that a transaction treated as sale of goods cannot be taxed again as a service merely because consideration is described as licence fee or royalty. As the appellant was only an intermediary and the end user obtained the right to use software, complete waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of service tax, interest and penalties was stayed pending appeal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in a service tax dispute arising from royalty and right-to-use software transactions, on the prima facie view that the activity was not taxable under Intellectual Property Right Services or Information Technology Software Service.

Analysis: The dispute concerned service tax demands raised on software-related transactions. The Tribunal noticed its earlier view that the sale of third-party software, and sale of standardised software, does not fall within Intellectual Property Right Services where copyright is excluded from that levy. It also noted the distinction between sale of software and sale of copyright, and relied on the principle that transaction treated as sale of goods cannot be taxed again as a service merely because consideration is structured around software licensing or royalty. The Tribunal further observed that the right to use software accrued to the end user and that the appellant functioned only as an intermediary. On this prima facie assessment, the demand did not warrant insistence on pre-deposit at that stage.

Conclusion: Complete waiver of pre-deposit of service tax, interest and penalties was granted and recovery was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.

Final Conclusion: The appellant secured interim protection against recovery, with the Tribunal finding a prima facie case against immediate enforcement of the tax demand.

---