Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on clearance of duty-paid parts free of charge to meet warranty obligations, reversal of the credit taken is sufficient compliance or duty is payable on the value of similar goods sold from the warehouse under Rule 57AB(1C) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The goods cleared from the factory were supplied free of cost only to satisfy warranty commitments and were neither sold nor resold. The comparison with warehouse sales was rejected because those sales were of spare parts for a different purpose and at a different commercial stage. The earlier decision dealing with goods actually resold by a sister concern was held to be factually distinct and inapplicable. Following the Larger Bench view in the identical situation, reversal of the credit already taken was treated as sufficient and no fresh valuation based on warehouse sale price was required.
Conclusion: Reversal of credit was held sufficient, and the demand based on re-determination of value was set aside in favour of the assessee.