Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal rules in favor of infant food manufacturer in Central Excise Tariff classification dispute</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI-III Versus M/s RAPTAKOS BRETT & CO LTD</h3> The Tribunal ruled in favor of the company manufacturing infant foods in a case concerning the classification of Vitamin Premix and Mineral Premix under ... Intermediate products like Vitamin Premixes and Mineral Premixes - manufacturing infant foods like 'Lactodoex, Lactodex Starter, Lactodex Follow-up, etc - Denial of the benefit of captive consumption notification No. 67/95-CE dt. 16/03/95 - Classification of goods under Tariff Heading 2936 or chapter heading 1901 - Held that:- From the process of manufacture of vitamin premixes it may be concluded that vitamin pre-mix is excluded from Tariff Heading 2936 by virtue of the above chapter note. The process of manufacture shows that to the processed starch, only vitamins and minerals are added. Thus it is a starch based product. The premix so formed is not a simple mixture of vitamins, either natural or synthesized. Further the language of Tariff Heading 2936 is that the vitamins and derivates are used primarily as vitamins. No evidence is placed on record to show that the pre-mix is primarily used as vitamins, its name notwithstanding. In fact it is a starch based product to which vitamins are added. Evidently the chapter heading 1901 is more specific. The Commissioner (Appeals) referred to Larger Bench decision in the case of Tetragen Chemie Vs. Commissioner reported in [1998 (9) TMI 390 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI] which was affirmed by Supreme Court in [2001 (7) TMI 127 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] to rule out classification under CETH 2936. - vitamin pre-mix and mineral pre-mix are mixtures of starch preparations to which nutrients i.e. vitamins and minerals are added and merit classification under CETH 1901 as preparation of starch attracting Nil rate of duty. - Decided against Revenue. Issues:Classification of Vitamin Premix and Mineral Premix under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.Analysis:1. The case involved an appeal by the Revenue against an order dropping demands and penalties against a company manufacturing infant foods. The dispute was regarding the classification of Vitamin Premix and Mineral Premix under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, as duty was demanded on these products.2. The Tribunal analyzed the manufacturing process of Vitamin Premix and Mineral Premix, concluding that they are mixtures of starch preparations with added nutrients. The process involved adding only vitamins and minerals to processed starch, making the products starch-based. This led to the conclusion that the premixes are not primarily used as vitamins, as required by Tariff Heading 2936, but rather as starch-based products classified under Chapter Heading 1901, attracting a nil rate of duty.3. The Tribunal referred to relevant tariff entries and chapter notes to support the classification decision. It highlighted that the products did not fall under Tariff Heading 2936, as they were not simple mixtures of vitamins but starch-based mixtures with added nutrients. The decision was further supported by a Larger Bench decision and a Supreme Court affirmation, which ruled out classification under CETH 2936.4. The Revenue contended that the company sold a similar product as Vitamin Premix to other buyers, but the company clarified that these were animal food supplements classified differently. The Tribunal noted that the Revenue's appeal lacked justification and coherence, indicating uncertainty in the department's case. The arguments regarding the classification of Vitamin Premix were not supported by substantial evidence or legal basis.5. Similarly, the dispute over the classification of Mineral Premix was addressed by the Tribunal. It was determined that the product was a mixture of minerals added to starch preparations, not separate chemically defined compounds under CETH 2851. The manufacturing process and relevant chapter notes supported the classification of Mineral Premix under Chapter Heading 1901, attracting a nil rate of duty.6. Ultimately, the Tribunal held that both Vitamin Premix and Mineral Premix were mixtures of starch preparations with added nutrients, classified under Chapter Heading 1901. The products were deemed exempted intermediate products under notification No. 67/95, as they were used in the manufacture of exempted final products. The classification under Chapter 19 attracting a nil rate of duty rendered the issue of the notification unnecessary for further consideration.7. Consequently, the Revenue's appeals were rejected, and the judgment was pronounced on 8.8.2014 by the Tribunal, settling the classification dispute in favor of the company manufacturing infant foods.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found