Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made to book profit on account of additional depreciation arising from a retrospective change in the method of providing depreciation was justified.
Analysis: The assessee changed its depreciation method from Straight Line Method to Written Down Value Method, and the resulting shortfall was charged to the profit and loss account for the relevant year. The Court followed the settled principle that, while computing book profit under section 115J of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Assessing Officer cannot travel beyond the profit and loss account except to the limited extent permitted by the statutory adjustments. The change in accounting method was consistent with recognised accounting standards and did not justify interference with the book profit as shown in the accounts.
Conclusion: The addition to book profit on account of additional depreciation was not sustainable and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the order deleting the addition was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: For computation of book profit under section 115J of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Assessing Officer cannot go behind the net profit shown in the profit and loss account except to the limited adjustments expressly permitted by law, and a bona fide change in depreciation method reflected in the accounts cannot be disregarded.