Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sanctioning authority should be directed to implement the Tribunal's earlier orders and dispose of the refund claim within a fixed time.
Analysis: The record showed repeated adjournments and no effective steps taken by the departmental authorities to comply with the earlier directions. The Tribunal noted that the refund claim had already been examined in the underlying proceedings and that the departmental stand was inconsistent with the earlier order passed in similar matters. In these circumstances, the Tribunal found that further delay was unjustified and that an expeditious direction was necessary to secure compliance.
Conclusion: The Tribunal directed the Commissioner to dispose of the refund claim within 15 days, failing which contempt proceedings could be initiated.