TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court denies Uttar Pradesh's requests for oral hearing and review petition, citing lack of grounds.</h1> <h3>Commissioner Versus Chhata Sugar Co. Ltd.</h3> The Supreme Court rejected the State of Uttar Pradesh's interlocutory applications for oral hearing and permission to file review petition(s), finding no ... Permission to file review application against the decision in COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, LUCKNOW Versus CHHATA SUGAR CO. LTD. [2004 (2) TMI 67 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] - applicant had not been arrayed as a party-respondent in the Civil Appeals and thus the applicant was neither heard nor represented in the hearing of the Civil Appeals - Held that:- Having gone through the available material on record, Court is not inclined to grant permission to the applicant - State of Uttar Pradesh to file review petition (s) - Decided against Revenue. The Supreme Court rejected the interlocutory applications for oral hearing and permission to file review petition(s) by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The Court found no grounds to grant permission and rejected the applications.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
