1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Customs Tribunal Upholds Rs. 31 Lakh Demand, Grants Rs. 7 Lakh Refund</h1> The High Court confirmed the Assistant Commissioner of Customs' demand of Rs. 31 lakhs and allowed a refund of Rs. 7,09,081 to the petitioner. The appeal ... Court dismissed the petition regarding confirmation of duty of βΉ 31 Lakhs as the appeal against the duty is pending with the Tribunal. Since the said appellate authority would be required to consider the legality and propriety of the demand since confirmed by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs it is not proper for this Court to express any view and/or opinion with regard to the claim made in the petition. Since the said appellate authority is in seisin over the matter the appellate authority is requested to dispose of the appeal preferably within a period of six months from the date of communication of this order without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. Issues:1. Confirmation of demand by Assistant Commissioner of Customs2. Refund allowed by Assistant Commissioner of Customs3. Challenge of confirmed demand before Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal4. Directions for disposal of appeal by the Appellate Tribunal5. Direction for the Customs Authorities regarding the amount in dispute6. Dismissal of writ petition as infructuousConfirmation of Demand by Assistant Commissioner of Customs:The writ petition challenged an order by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs confirming a demand of Rs. 31 lakhs and allowing a refund of Rs. 7,09,081 to the petitioner. The petitioner had received the refund amount based on an order passed by the High Court earlier.Challenge of Confirmed Demand before Appellate Tribunal:The confirmed demand was subject to challenge before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal through Appeal No. 312 of 2009. The appeal was admitted, and a stay petition was allowed. The High Court refrained from expressing any view on the legality of the demand, deferring to the jurisdiction of the appellate authority.Directions for Disposal of Appeal by Appellate Tribunal:The High Court instructed the Appellate Tribunal to expedite the disposal of the appeal within six months without unnecessary adjournments. The Customs Authorities were directed to maintain the disputed amount of Rs. 31 lakhs in a short-term fixed deposit with a Nationalised Bank until the appeal's resolution.Dismissal of Writ Petition as Infructuous:During the pendency of the writ petition, the adjudication proceedings were completed, and the demand was levied, rendering the petition infructuous. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, considering the completion of the adjudication process.This judgment by the High Court of Calcutta addressed the challenge to a demand confirmed by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, the subsequent appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, and provided directives for the disposal of the appeal and the handling of the disputed amount by the Customs Authorities. The dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous marked the conclusion of the legal proceedings in this matter.