Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal recalculates disallowance under Section 14A and upholds depreciation on securities</h1> <h3>State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur Versus The ACIT., Circle-6, Jaipur</h3> State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur Versus The ACIT., Circle-6, Jaipur - TMI Issues Involved:1. Applicability and quantification of disallowance under Section 14A.2. Disallowance of depreciation on investment in securities shifted from 'Held for Trading' to 'Available for Sale' category.3. Reduction in depreciation claim under Section 32.4. Disallowance of prior period expenses and miscellaneous expenses.5. Deletion of addition by taking interest income on government and other securities on an accrual basis instead of a due basis.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Applicability and Quantification of Disallowance under Section 14A:The assessee challenged the disallowance of Rs. 11,21,00,000 under Section 14A, arguing that Rule 8D, introduced on 24/03/2008, should not apply retrospectively to the assessment year 2004-05. The Tribunal noted the Hon'ble Bombay High Court's ruling in Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, which held that Rule 8D is applicable prospectively from A.Y. 2008-09. Thus, the Tribunal set aside the issue to the Assessing Officer to recompute the disallowance under Section 14A on a reasonable basis, providing the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard.2. Disallowance of Depreciation on Investment in Securities Shifted from 'Held for Trading' to 'Available for Sale' Category:The Assessing Officer disallowed Rs. 6,98,07,032 as depreciation on securities shifted from 'Held for Trading' to 'Available for Sale,' arguing that the depreciation should be set off against the appreciation in the same category. The Tribunal upheld the assessee's method, which followed RBI guidelines, stating that the depreciation should be fully provided for at the time of shifting categories and that the appreciation should be ignored as per RBI's prudential norms. The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal on this ground, referencing the ITAT Bangalore Bench's decision in State Bank of Mysore Vs. DCIT.3. Reduction in Depreciation Claim under Section 32:The Assessing Officer reduced the depreciation claim by Rs. 5,86,050, aligning it with the auditor's report. The Tribunal referenced its own decision in the assessee's case for A.Y. 2003-04, which held that the opening WDV should not be altered due to changes in depreciation rates. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to work out the depreciation without shifting the opening WDV of plant and machinery to the WDV of furniture and fixtures, thus allowing the assessee's appeal on this ground.4. Disallowance of Prior Period Expenses and Miscellaneous Expenses:The Assessing Officer disallowed Rs. 34,23,944 as prior period expenses and Rs. 28,85,358 as miscellaneous expenses. The Tribunal noted that these expenses crystallized during the year under consideration and were claimed after the closing of books of account. The Tribunal, following its decision in the assessee's case for A.Y. 2003-04, allowed these expenses, noting that the genuineness of the expenses was not doubted by the lower authorities.5. Deletion of Addition by Taking Interest Income on Government and Other Securities on an Accrual Basis:The Assessing Officer added Rs. 4,56,60,998 by taking interest income on an accrual basis, while the assessee had offered it on a due basis. The Tribunal referenced its consistent rulings in the assessee's favor from A.Y. 1991-92 to 2001-02 and noted the Committee on Disputes' decision that there was no loss of revenue to the department. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of the addition, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.Conclusion:The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to recompute disallowance under Section 14A reasonably and to work out depreciation without altering the opening WDV. The Tribunal allowed the depreciation on securities shifted categories and prior period expenses, while dismissing the Revenue's appeal regarding interest income on an accrual basis.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found