TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Denial of Cenvat Credit Upheld for Transportation Costs</h1> <h3>M/s. Kohinoor Biscuits Products Versus Commissioner Of Central Excise</h3> M/s. Kohinoor Biscuits Products Versus Commissioner Of Central Excise - 2015 (38) S.T.R. J124 (All.) Issues:1. Denial of cenvat credit for service tax and freight paid by M/s. Parle on inward and outward transportation.2. Denial of cenvat credit for service tax paid on outward freight to Goods Transport Agency (GTA).3. Denial of cenvat credit for service tax paid on outward transportation to the depots of M/s. Parle.Analysis:1. The appeal concerns the denial of cenvat credit for service tax and freight paid by M/s. Parle on inward and outward transportation. The appellant manufactures biscuits using raw materials supplied by Parle Biscuits, and the finished goods are cleared to Parle Biscuits' Depot. The place of removal is determined to be the factory gate of the appellant, not the Depot of Parle Biscuits. As per Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, the appellant is entitled to credit only up to the place of removal. Since Parle Biscuits bears the freight cost and no amount is borne by the appellant, the Tribunal's denial of cenvat credit is deemed correct. The judgment affirms the Tribunal's decision, as it aligns with the legal provisions.2. The second issue pertains to the denial of cenvat credit for service tax paid on outward freight to Goods Transport Agency (GTA). The appellant argues that the 'place of removal' should be considered the Depot of Parle Biscuits, relying on Section 4(3)(c) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. However, since the sale did not occur on an 'FOR Destination' basis and the liability for freight is on Parle Biscuits, the Tribunal's decision to deny the credit is upheld. The judgment emphasizes that the appellant cannot claim credit beyond the actual place of removal, which is the factory gate, as established by the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal.3. Lastly, the issue concerns the denial of cenvat credit for service tax paid on outward transportation to the depots of M/s. Parle. The Tribunal's decision is supported by the fact that the goods are cleared at the factory gate, and the freight cost is borne by Parle Biscuits, not the appellant. Since the sale is not on an 'FOR Destination' basis, the place of removal remains the factory gate, justifying the denial of cenvat credit. The judgment concludes that no substantial question of law arises from the appeal, leading to its dismissal without costs.
TaxTMI 