Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for total waiver of pre-deposit of service tax and penalty, in view of the exemption limit under Notification No. 6/2005 dated 01.03.2005 and the allegation regarding use of brand name.
Analysis: The appellant claimed that during the relevant period it rendered cable operator service through its own cable network, distributed television channels in its own name, and did not use the brand name of any other cable operator. The available material also indicated that the taxable value was below the exemption limit of Rs. 10 lakhs under Notification No. 6/2005 dated 01.03.2005. On this prima facie assessment, the demand did not justify insisting on pre-deposit at the interim stage.
Conclusion: The appellant was held entitled to total waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery during pendency of the appeal.