2014 (10) TMI 311 - AT - Service Tax

Tribunal Upholds Service Tax Demand on Works Contract Services; Exemption Claim Rejected

SN PAWAR Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NASHIK

The Tribunal upheld the service tax demand on works contract services provided to a Defence PSU, rejecting the exemption claim based on the recipient's ... Waiver of pre deposit - Commercial or industrial construction service - Held that:- Appellant has undertaken commercial construction service for HAL and the services include supply of material also while computing the service tax demand, abatement has been given in respect of the material supplied. Therefore, prima facie the confirmation of demand appears to be sustainable in law. As regards the plea of time bar, it is on record that the appellant has been a service tax registrant since 2005. In his statement recorded before the investigating authorities, he has also admitted to the tax liability and also undertook to make goods the service tax liability. Thereafter, the show cause notice was issued and the appellant did not even bother to file any reply to the notice or appear before the adjudicating authority. Similarly, before the appellate authority also, the appellant did not choose to appear for personal hearing. This conduct of the appellant does not reflect well on him. In these circumstances, we are of the prima facie view that the appellant has not made out any case for complete waiver of pre-deposit - partial stay granted. Issues:1. Service tax demand confirmation for works contract service.2. Applicability of service tax on services rendered to Defence PSU.3. Time-barred show cause notice and tax liability acknowledgment.Analysis:Issue 1: Service tax demand confirmation for works contract serviceThe appellant, who undertook works contract service for a Defence PSU, appealed against the confirmation of service tax demand of Rs. 20,48,456 along with penalties. The appellant argued that services to a Defence PSU should not be subject to service tax as only commercial or industrial construction is taxable. However, the Tribunal found no provision exempting Defence PSUs from service tax. As the appellant was registered for commercial or industrial construction services since 2005 and had admitted to tax liability previously, the confirmation of demand was deemed sustainable. The Tribunal directed the appellant to make a pre-deposit of 50% of the confirmed service tax demand, with the balance waived upon compliance.Issue 2: Applicability of service tax on services rendered to Defence PSUThe appellant contended that services provided to a Defence PSU should not attract service tax. The Tribunal held that being a company incorporated under the Companies Act, the Defence PSU operates on a commercial basis and is liable to service tax. The appellant's argument that services to HAL should be exempt from tax was dismissed, emphasizing that HAL's commercial nature makes it subject to service tax. Abatement was granted for material supplied in the construction services provided to HAL.Issue 3: Time-barred show cause notice and tax liability acknowledgmentThe appellant claimed the show cause notice was time-barred as it was issued in 2012 for the period from 2007 to 2012. The Tribunal noted that the appellant, a registered service tax provider since 2005, had acknowledged the tax liability in previous statements. Despite opportunities, the appellant did not respond to the notice or appear before the authorities. The Tribunal held that the appellant's failure to engage in the proceedings did not warrant a complete waiver of pre-deposit, directing a 50% pre-deposit within eight weeks.In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the service tax demand on works contract services provided to a Defence PSU, rejected the exemption claim based on the recipient's nature, and required a partial pre-deposit due to the appellant's conduct during the proceedings.